I was reading the review of a book on the way the Internet is reshaping American culture. The reviewer highlighted a few arguments from the book, which I thought would make great discussions (and maybe featured questions
. So, I decided to post them here.
1. The Internet is the first social environment to serve the needs of the isolated, elevated, asocial individual.
2. The Internet is possibly the most radical transformation of public and private life in the history of humankind.
3. The Internet invites people to carefully craft their privacy into a marketable, public style. In doing so, it creates an environment in which everything is on display all the time… This turns the culture into a giant popularity contest, an expanding and never-ending version of high school.
4. Popular culture used to draw people to what they liked. Internet culture draws people to what everyone else likes.
I think the first two statements do not need to be discussed. The Internet is a huge outlet for people who are isolated or asocial. And it had a big impact on public and private life or how we define these.
The last two arguments are more interesting. I agree that people craft an online persona, a representation of themselves in the digital medium. I find this to be a fascinating extension of real life, not necessarily something bad. Still, finding people from high school on Facebook does not always bring back the nicest memories
Popular culture is mainstream by definition. So, I don’t understand how it would help people discover what they like rather than what others like. I feel like the Internet is just another medium to promote popular culture.
What do you think? Do you agree with these arguments?
Recent Comments